SEC Filings

10-Q
ARRAY BIOPHARMA INC filed this Form 10-Q on 05/10/2017
Entire Document
 

Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows accounting guidance on fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as for certain assets and liabilities that are initially recorded at their estimated fair values. Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses the following three-level hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs to value our financial instruments:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.Estimated fair values of financial instruments classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, where the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.

Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires us to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability. The use of different assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on estimated fair values. Accordingly, the fair value estimates disclosed or initial amounts recorded may not be indicative of the amount that we or holders of the instruments could realize in a current market exchange.

Certain of the Company's financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, but are recorded at amounts that approximate their fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature, such as cash, accounts receivable and payable, and other financial instruments in current assets or current liabilities.

Notes Payable Fair Value Option

As described further in Note 4 - Debt - Notes Payable, in September 2016, the Company issued Subordinated Convertible Promissory Notes to Redmile Capital Offshore Fund II, Ltd. and Redmile Biopharma Investments I, L.P. in the aggregate original principal amount of $10.0 million. The Company has elected the fair value option to account for these notes due to the complexity and number of embedded features. Accordingly, the Company records these notes at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the statement of operations. As a result of applying the fair value option, direct costs and fees related to the notes were recognized in earnings (as "change in fair value of notes payable") as incurred and were not deferred.

Stock-Based Compensation

Previously, FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, ASC 718, required forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differed from those estimates. FASB subsequently issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"), which allows an entity to elect as an accounting policy either to continue to estimate the total number of awards for which the requisite service period will not be rendered or to account for forfeitures when they occur.

In the third quarter of 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09 and elected to modify its accounting policy to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company applied this change in accounting policy on a modified retrospective basis, with July 1, 2016 as the effective date of adoption. As a result, the Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings which resulted in an increase to accumulated deficit of $0.4 million with an offsetting increase to additional paid-in capital (zero net total equity impact) as of the date of adoption. These adjustments were principally related to additional stock compensation expense that would have been recognized under ASC 718 on unvested outstanding options and restricted stock units that were unadjusted for estimated forfeitures. The Company classifies the excess tax benefits from employee stock plans as a reduction from financing cash flows for all periods presented. In addition, under ASU 2016-09, previously unrecognized deferred tax assets were recognized on a modified retrospective basis as of July 1, 2016. As a result, the Company recorded approximately $5.5 million of additional deferred tax assets, which are fully offset by a valuation allowance.

10